[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#118294: mutt_1.3.23-2(unstable/ia64): build-depends on a non-US package

On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 12:26:32AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:

> > OK. Since I'm not going to build two packages I'd like to know what mutt
> > users would prefer:
> > - I move the package to non-US
> > - I remove again and forever SSL support

I vote for the first option.

>   IMO ssl support is crucial (on the internet) - everything should go
> via secure protocols (is there any reason to have insecure protocols?)

Protocols can be secure without necessarily being encrypted. Hop-by-hop
encryption is a bit lame though, it would be far better (security and
performance-wise) if everybody used end-to-end encryption, like PGP.

Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
  Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.warande.net>

Attachment: pgpiZKjJmfaMO.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: