Re: C++ Boost
Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 02:31:52PM -0500, David A. Greene wrote:
old. I've a feeling Raphael is too busy to fix the packages.
This would not surprise me - I've had similar experiences with several
of his other packages, with even trivial bugs going unfixed for very
long periods of time.
Considering that portions of Boost have already been submitted
to the standards committee for the next revision (this is all
_very_ preliminary), I think it's important to get them
fixed and into Debian. I view Boost as another C++ standard
library, something every C++ developer should have in the
toolbox. Eventually, part or all of it _will_ be an official
standard library. It _really_is_ that useful. IMHO, this
is too important to be left in the lurch. 'Course, I might be
somewhat biased. :)
-Dave
--
"Some little people have music in them, but Fats, he was all music,
and you know how big he was." -- James P. Johnson
Reply to:
- References:
- C++ Boost
- From: "David A. Greene" <greened@eecs.umich.edu>
- Re: C++ Boost
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@sirena.org.uk>