On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 09:03:41AM +1100, Jason Thomas wrote: > unfortunately the changes to libexpat1 although accidental made the > package correct! so libexpat1 is not broken (now), the other packages > are! Uh, no. You can't randomly change the soname of a library without also changing the package's name. If libexpat1 provides libexpat.so.0, and you want to provide libexpat.so.1, you _must_ rename the package. Right now, afaict, someone should be uploading libexpat1 with a symlink from libexpat.so.0 to libexpat.so.1 with the urgency in the changelog set to high to make everything unbroken again. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt
Attachment:
pgpXTnLnlW2fr.pgp
Description: PGP signature