[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Take 2: Preparing 2.2r4



From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
Subject: Take 2: Preparing 2.2r4
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 23:43:43 +0200

> freewnn-common       stable    1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1           all
> freewnn-common       updates   1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3  all
> freewnn-cserver-dev  stable    1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1           alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> freewnn-cserver-dev  updates   1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3  arm, i386, m68k
> freewnn-cserver      stable    1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1           alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> freewnn-cserver      updates   1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3  arm, i386, m68k
> freewnn-jserver-dev  stable    1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1           alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> freewnn-jserver-dev  updates   1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3  arm, i386, m68k
> freewnn-jserver      stable    1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1           alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> freewnn-jserver      updates   1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3  arm, i386, m68k
> freewnn-kserver-dev  stable    1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1           alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> freewnn-kserver-dev  updates   1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3  arm, i386, m68k
> freewnn-kserver      stable    1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1           alpha, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, sparc
> freewnn-kserver      updates   1.1.0+1.1.1-a016-1.potato.3  arm, i386, m68k
> 
> 	* [security fix] backport from freewnn 1.1.0+1.1.1-a017-6.4
> 	  - adduser wnn, kwnn, cwnn for jserver,kserver,cserver respectively
> 	    instead of running as root user
> 	  - restrict upload/create path under jserver_dir
> 
> 	The 2nd upload is required to make the package installable
> 	*sigh*  At least, it is proved to be tested now...
> 
> 	However: alpha, powerpc and sparc are missing

Now freewnn packages for powerpc are available in
potato-proposed-updates and for sparc in incoming. Can anyone build
these packages on alpha? I cannot reach any alpha machines...

-- 
Keita Maehara <maehara@debian.org>



Reply to: