Re: [ITA] Intent To Adopt Readseq
changelog of readseq says:
readseq (0.0-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Maintainer set to Debian QA Group <email@example.com>.
-- Adrian Bunk <firstname.lastname@example.org> Fri, 24 Aug 2001 23:51:22 +0200
I intend to adopt this package because I need it for a new project.
By this way I intent to close bug #43372. I will use the latest
sources of version 1 which are in C because I need exactly this C
version. I will not package version 2 for the following reasons:
- Java adds en extra dependency of java-virtual-machine which
would bother my users and me
- most certainly it would let readseq go to contrib which I want
to avoid (not checked)
- I really need the C version for certain reasons.
So my upload not really resolves bug #43372. If the reporter really
wants to have readseq Version 2 packaged (which might make sense for
sure) the bug should be reasigned to "[RFP/ITP] readseq2" and should made
a separate package readseq2.
Any problems with this plan?