Re: Questions regarding the Security Secretary Position
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Adam McKenna wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 01:34:19AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
>>
>> Did you have something other than ad hominem attacks to add?
>
>It wasn't an ad hominem attack -- it was relevant information, in response to
>a question posed by a fellow DD. Even if it was false, I still don't see how
>it could be considered an ad hominem.
Dress it up in a damn chiffon dress for all I care, it's still a pig.
>--Adam
>
--
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu
Reply to: