Re: RFC: upstream-link in the BTS and package descriptions

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFC: upstream-link in the BTS and package descriptions
From: Sebastian Rittau <srittau@jroger.in-berlin.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 19:40:27 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011021194027.A1518@jroger.in-berlin.de>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011021175331.A2960@edelstoff>
References: <[🔎] 200110211245.OAA26519@alr.rzbt.fh-hamburg.de> <[🔎] 20011021175331.A2960@edelstoff>

On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 05:53:31PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:

> I would rather like to see a link to upstream bug report system (if
> avaliable) from the BTS. That way, hopefully, people might easier report
> upstream bugs/wishlist items correctly.

What is wrong with reporting upstream bugs in the Debian BTS?

 - Sebastian

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: upstream-link in the BTS and package descriptions
  - From: Peter Mathiasson <peter@mathiasson.nu>

References:
- RFC: upstream-link in the BTS and package descriptions
  - From: Ulrich Eckhardt <doomster@knuut.de>
- Re: RFC: upstream-link in the BTS and package descriptions
  - From: Peter Mathiasson <peter@mathiasson.nu>

Prev by Date: Re: make-kpkg and initrd
Next by Date: Re: strange dependencies
Previous by thread: Re: RFC: upstream-link in the BTS and package descriptions
Next by thread: Re: RFC: upstream-link in the BTS and package descriptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread