Re: editor alternatives?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 06:39:10PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> * Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net> [2001.10.18 18:04:34+0200]:
> > I still haven't seen anything as intuitive as cat. cat really makes
> > for an excellent newbie editor:
> >
> > * it doesn't have unwanted features
> > * it is available on all unix systems
> > * it's small and fast
> > * it doesn't have hard to learn keycombinations
> > * it's 100% wydiwyg (what you do is what you get)
>
> uhm, i can *create* files with cat, i can *view* files with cat,
> editing with cat proves to be horrible, especially if all you need to
> do i correcting a typo. are you okay, Wichert, or did you propose this
> in all seriosity?
YHBT, YHL. HAND.
;)
>
> --
> martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
> \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
>
> "it is the mark of an educated mind
> to be able to entertain a thought
> without accepting it."
> -- aristoteles
--
Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT "Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!"
--from a /. post
\_|_/ Andago
\/ \/ Av. Santa Engracia, 54
a n d a g o |-- E-28010 Madrid - tfno:+34(91)2041100
/\___/\ http://www.andago.com
/ | \ "Innovando en Internet"
eric@andago.com
Reply to: