[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libguile9 not in testing?

On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 06:08:41PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On 10 Oct 2001, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > >>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> >
> >     Anthony> On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Adrian Bunk
> >     Anthony> wrote:
> >     >> One reason is that scwm doesn't compile with the new guile and
> >     >> therefore always has a dependency on libguile6.
> > So why not provide an oldlibs package that supplies libguile6?
> scwm is the _only_ package in unstable that depends on libguile6. It's
> perhaps the easiest solution if someone with a bit guile knowledge would
> fix scwm...

Let's file an RC bug on it to have it removed from testing, so that
all the other packages which are waiting for libguile9 can get in.

It's a shame the testing scripts can't balance the effects of
its decisions like this :-)

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>

Reply to: