Re: ddtp: new notifications mails, opt-in or opt-out?

["Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>]

neuffer@sciobyte.de wrote:
 
  >> I was not talking about constantly calling for voting, but for important
  >> changes like the ddts is introducing into debian. And having 10-20
  >> people creating a consensus for all 700 and more developers is in my
  >> opinion not acceptable.
  >
  >Then they should participate in the discussion.

I have not wanted to contribute to this ...prolonged discussion.  But
if silence is to be taken as agreement with whoever shouts loudest, I
suppose I must stick my oar in.

If things are being done concerning my packges I want to know about it.
I do not want to risk missing information in which I might be interested,
therefore I prefer opt-out to opt-in.

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47  6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
                 ========================================
     "Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of 
      God; for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither 
      tempteth he any man; But every man is tempted, when he
      is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed."          
                                       James 1:13,14