Re: ddtp: new notifications mails, opt-in or opt-out?
neuffer@sciobyte.de wrote:
>> I was not talking about constantly calling for voting, but for important
>> changes like the ddts is introducing into debian. And having 10-20
>> people creating a consensus for all 700 and more developers is in my
>> opinion not acceptable.
>
>Then they should participate in the discussion.
I have not wanted to contribute to this ...prolonged discussion. But
if silence is to be taken as agreement with whoever shouts loudest, I
suppose I must stick my oar in.
If things are being done concerning my packges I want to know about it.
I do not want to risk missing information in which I might be interested,
therefore I prefer opt-out to opt-in.
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of
God; for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither
tempteth he any man; But every man is tempted, when he
is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed."
James 1:13,14
Reply to: