[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FYI: intent to NMU to fix SDL + static X extension library problem

On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:

> I struggled to come up with a name that would make it clear that what we
> have is really libsd1.2, and not some fork or beta version.  That's
> almost impossible to do, but I settled on "libsdl1.2debian".  Yes, I
> know, it sucks, but keep in mind that we're in this fix in the first
> place because we *ALREADY* forked the SDL library to include the static
> X extension libraries -- on half of our architectures.

Are any commercial programs dynamically linked against libsdl1.2? I know
that e.g. many popular games that run under Linux use SDL.



Get my GPG key: finger bunk@debian.org | gpg --import

Fingerprint: B29C E71E FE19 6755 5C8A  84D4 99FC EA98 4F12 B400

Reply to: