Re: FYI: intent to NMU to fix SDL + static X extension library problem
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, ajt@debian.org, gengameng@packages.debian.org, libsdl1.2@packages.debian.org, smpeg@packages.debian.org, cts@debian.org
- Subject: Re: FYI: intent to NMU to fix SDL + static X extension library problem
- From: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 16:07:55 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20011005160755.B17873@debian.org>
- Mail-followup-to: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, ajt@debian.org, gengameng@packages.debian.org, libsdl1.2@packages.debian.org, smpeg@packages.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20011005151402.A6838@deadbeast.net>; from branden@debian.org on Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 03:14:02PM -0500
- References: <[🔎] 20011005151402.A6838@deadbeast.net>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 03:14:02PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> RELEASE MANAGER AND PACKAGE MAINTAINERS:
>
> It would be least disruptive if all of these shared library packages
> were installed into the archive on the same day. I'd like your blessing
> to do an NMU of each of them. I'll accept full responsbility for any
> breakage I cause as a result.
Go ahead for sdl-image and sdl-mixer (will you fix the other bug you reported
in sdl-mixer in that upload as well?).
I will check your fix on m68k tonight and prepare new versions of my sdl
based packages.
Christian, who should have insisted on a debian mailing list for sdl
packages...
Reply to: