Re: Bug in bash

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug in bash
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 14:50:42 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20011002145042.U14582@wiggy.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] pzr8smmcof.fsf@eeyore.ibcinc.com>
References: <[🔎] 20011002121238.B25330@lemon-computing.com> <[🔎] pzr8smmcof.fsf@eeyore.ibcinc.com>

Previously Roderick Schertler wrote:
> Sure, but it isn't a bug we can actually fix.  If either shell actually
> did what POSIX says, all the maintainer scripts which use "echo -n"
> would break.

So filing writing bugreports.

Wichert.

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________
 /       Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool     \
| wichert@wiggy.net                   http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0  2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug in bash
  - From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Bug in bash
  - From: Nick Phillips <nwp@lemon-computing.com>
- Re: Bug in bash
  - From: Roderick Schertler <roderick@argon.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug in bash
Next by Date: Re: Bug in bash
Previous by thread: Re: Bug in bash
Next by thread: Re: Bug in bash
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread