Re: Package versioning of software beta/pre versions
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:25:48PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > Has anyone a better idea?
> 1.0.9-0pre1.1, 1.0.9-pre1.2, etc.
NB: messing with the Debian revisions sucks (in particular it makes it
impossible to work out what's a binary NMU and what's not). 1.0.8-9pre1-1
sucks somewhat less.
Cheers,
aj (#62529, #93386)
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Freedom itself was attacked this morning by faceless cowards.
And freedom will be defended.'' Condolences to all involved.
Reply to: