Re: new port: the never ending story
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:15:03AM +0200, A Mennucc1 wrote:
>
> hi
>
>
> --- still on the name
>
> <flame mode>
> let's start by a few quotations:
>
> "an arch is an arch is an arch is an arch"
>
> "an arch by any other name would work the same"
>
> "shut up and show them the arch"
>
> it: "l' arch e' l'apostrofo rosa fra le parole 'package' e '.deb'"
> en: "the arch is the pink apostrophe between 'package' and '.deb'"
>
> what I mean is: is the name of the arch so so so so relevant?
> when we are sure that it makes reasonable sense, and that
> it has no legal problems, doesnt this suffice?
> </flame mode>
Please do your port, don't waste your energy in such futile debates :) If I'm
interested in the port, I don't give a shit to what name it'll have. I just
want it to *work*
Thanks.
--
Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT "Oh My God! They killed init! You Bastards!"
--from a /. post
\_|_/ Andago
\/ \/ Av. Santa Engracia, 54
a n d a g o |-- E-28010 Madrid - tfno:+34(91)2041100
/\___/\ http://www.andago.com
/ | \ "Innovando en Internet"
eric@andago.com
Reply to: