Re: How many people need locales?
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 12:03:19PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The bug basically says "/etc/locale.gen should not be a conffile
> because most people will need to modify it" but Ben does not agree
> that people using locales is "most people".
Recent copies (unless it was changed back to big file edition) are
blank, and add the list of locales to /usr/share/doc/locales/SUPPORTED.gz.
So people will very rarely get prompted for changes. Then, what's the problem?
I don't want to have to go through a debconf interface to try and configure
my locale.gen file; heck, SUPPORTED doesn't even include half my locales
(mainly UTF-8). How does making it a conffile hurt things again?
(locale.gen attached as an extreme example that needs to be supported.)
David Starner - firstname.lastname@example.org
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
# This file lists locales that you wish to have built. You can find a list
# of valid supported locales at /usr/share/doc/locales/SUPPORTED.gz. Other
# combinations are possible, but may not be well tested. If you change
# this file, you need to rerun locale-gen.