Re: moving a package from non-US/main to main?
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Haber <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Marc> On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 22:49:00 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila
Marc> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> However, you can repackage the .orig.tar.gz source and remove
>> the non-US bits from it. Then you could upload both source and
>> binaries to main.
Marc> That would break the principle of pristine sources, though.
So, that's not a principle, it's a somewhat desirable goal. For some
licenses it may be necessary, but there are many reasons you might
have to change the upstream tarball, including for example DFSG
problems with part of a program.
Marc> Can anybody confirm that CAST is not among the non-USable
First, CAST is actually going to be less exportable than SHA. CAST is
a crypto system family, SHA is a hash.
I think software that only uses SHA is likely not to fall under ECCN
5d002 or 5e002 of the US Commerce Control List and thus doesn't fall
under the annoying crypto stuff. I.E. I suspect you could have stuck
the SHA only version in main, but need to stick SHA+CAST in non-us.
Marc> Greetings Marc
Marc> -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy
Marc> copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the |
Marc> Mailadresse im Header Karlsruhe, Germany | Beginning of
Marc> Wisdom " | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15 Nordisch by Nature |
Marc> Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29
Marc> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Marc> firstname.lastname@example.org with a subject of
Marc> "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com