On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 10:48:45 +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > Why is the old one removed? If we kept the libgal packages until nothing > depended on it, and then removed it we would not have a problem. I proposed changing libgal's packaging so that this would be possible (http://bugs.debian.org/107796) but the libgal maintainer has decided not to follow my proposal. Ray -- Obsig: developing a new sig