[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#110273: ITP: lvcool -- "cools" the AMD K7 (Athlon/Duron) CPU



On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:48:49PM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:

> In contrast, all lvcool does (and can do) is set its nice value to the
> highest possible (20).  It will get normally scheduled by the kernel and
> run its idle loop even under 100% CPU load, taking away cycles from your
> kernel compile/quake/<insert favourite CPU hog>.

I'm going to state the obvious: why not just underclock the CPU?

Also, users of lvcool should be warned that cycling the CPU
temperature over a larger range may cause faster CPU degredation
than simply running it at a higher base temperature.  I assume
less "cpu degredation" is the preceived benefit of running at a
lower temperature, since nobody has mentioned measuring overall
system power consumption.  (And comparing the added cost of
electricity to the cost of replacing parts that break because
they've been power cycled too often.)



dave...



Reply to: