[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITC: dpkg-sysconfig



On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:58:06PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> 
> > > Errmmm ... but I think it'd be a *nice* idea to have a choice
> > > between different usage profiles! (Say local-mailserver, ISP-mailserver,
> > > secure-samba, open-samba, samba-as-domain-server-for-win-2000 etc.)
> > > *t
> >
> > It is possible but the administrator should make such packages, or?
> >
> > Well ... if you all people think my tool is good enough for that, sure
> > but that is not my intention.
> >
> > My intention is that the administrator makes such configurations
> > themself. We will get too much packages in debian if we allow this
> > kind of stuff. :)
> 
> The problem is not too much packages but an inadquate package
> organisation. HInt: subpackages.
> *t

I do not really understand? Do you want a better organisation on the
packages that are in debian, or on my tool or on 'configuration' packages?

Regards,

// Ola

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Tomas Pospisek
> 	     SourcePole   -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> 	     http://sourcepole.ch
> 	     Elestastrasse 18, 7310 Bad Ragaz, Switzerland
> 	     Tel: +41 (81) 330 77 11
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
 --------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/  opal@debian.org                     Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11   \
|  opal@lysator.liu.se                 584 36 LINKÖPING         |
|  +46 (0)13-17 69 83                  +46 (0)70-332 1551       |
|  http://www.opal.dhs.org             UIN/icq: 4912500         |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36  4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------



Reply to: