[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#62352: marked as done (/usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion)



Your message dated Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:12:32 +0100
with message-id <20010825001231.A694@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Bug#62352: /usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2000 23:30:36 +0000
Received: (qmail 17469 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2000 23:30:35 -0000
Received: from smtp.sw.oz.au (firewall-user@203.31.96.1)
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 13 Apr 2000 23:30:35 -0000
Received: from tadpole.chubbnet.sw.oz.au (dialup7.sw.oz.au [192.41.203.117])
	by smtp.sw.oz.au (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16754
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:30:01 +1000 (EST)
Received: from peterc by tadpole.chubbnet.sw.oz.au with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 12fG2v-0003TK-00; Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:50:37 +1000
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: /usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion
Reply-to: peterc@aurema.com
Message-Id: <E12fG2v-0003TK-00@tadpole.chubbnet.sw.oz.au>
Sender: Peter Chubb <peterc@chubbnet.sw.oz.au>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:50:37 +1000
From: peterc@aurema.com


Package: general
Version: potato

New documentation is being installed in /usr/share/doc (whereas it was 
installed in /usr/doc in the slink release)  

This is fine, except that the default apache config still sets /doc/
URLs to /usr/doc

My system now has documentation in both /usr/doc (from slink) and
/usr/share/doc (from potato) -- sometimes for the same package (e.g.,
xserver_s3) 

The dhelp package indexes all this nicely, but the URLs generated are
not useable by apache.

My solution at present is manually to delete documentation from
/usr/doc that is duplicated in /usr/doc and in /usr/share/doc, rename
stuff in /usr/doc  to /usr/share/doc, and then to symlink
/usr/share/doc to /usr/doc 

But this is UGLY.

Peter C

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 62352-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2001 23:13:08 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Fri Aug 24 18:13:08 2001
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15aQ8S-0007eT-00; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:13:08 -0500
Received: from [217.35.25.186] (helo=arborlon.riva.ucam.org)
	by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #6)
	id 15aQ8R-0000Yt-00
	for 62352-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:13:07 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 15aQ7s-0000Bj-00
	for <62352-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:12:32 +0100
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:12:32 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
To: 62352-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#62352: /usr/doc and /usr/share/doc confusion
Message-ID: <20010825001231.A694@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
X-BadReturnPath: cjwatson@arborlon.riva.ucam.org rewritten as cjwatson@flatline.org.uk
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: 62352-done@bugs.debian.org

Hi,

I think this bug has been dealt with now:

  * The default Debian Apache configuration now aliases /doc/ to
    /usr/share/doc/ by default;

  * Almost every package now uses /usr/share/doc. See
    http://qa.debian.org/fhs.html for the very few remaining exceptions,
    all of which (should) have release-critical bugs filed about that.

I'm therefore closing this bug.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: