Re: Perl/Debconf broken in woody?
David A. Greene wrote:
> So what's the verdict? _Something_ is wrong and I believe a bug report
> should go somewhere, but it's not clear to me who is responsible for a
> fix.
I would file a serious bug against `catalog'.
This not the first time a package in woody contains a debconf template
which debconf in potato is unable to parse (see Bug #106360 for an example).
Since we can't move debconf in woody to potato the only solution is to fix
whatever template in woody makes debconf in potato to fail.
Reply to: