Re: rdp-client package
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +1000, Sam Johnston wrote:
> Yes it's unlikely anything will depend on it, although there could be a case
> made for a task which pulls in all the packages necessary for a 'thin
> client'. One would then conceivably want terminal-server-client rather than
> specifically rdesktop, rwin, etc.. I think update-alternatives is probably
> what I'm after... in which case the question about a suitable name still
> stands... the geeks or the users?
>
> I see xterm (which I figure is a similar package) 'provides'
> x-terminal-emulator...
Only because things depend upon it. You already said nothing is likely
to depend upon either of these packages. Neither rdesktop nor rwin
conflict.
A virtual name is not (at this stage) necessary. Why not worry about it
if it ever becomes necessary.
Anand
Reply to: