Hi... On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 10:07:58AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > >> Note I'm not specifically talking about OpenOffice. If OpenOffice is >> actually usuable for something by a non-developer, then great. If it's just >> useful for development, there's no use in putting into unstable. >Have you actually tried OpenOffice (you can download precompiled binaries >from www.openoffice.org)? There have been some issues with printing, but >these have now mostly been resolved. OpenOffice works, and is quite >stable. Yes.. I agree! >And since it's got more features than KOffice, I don't see any reason why >it couldn't be in sid... :) I can't see the reasons, why we should not put OpenOffice into sid. >> > OO sounds like it's a lot buggier than most applications (not surprising >> > since it used to be commercial/proprietary code) but the only way it's >> > going to conform to the standards expected of free software is if people >> > work on it and test it.> >> When you've got a program that's almost done, >I don't know whether it's almost done, but it's quite stable. At least a >"bit" more stable than Konqueror is (which is a great browser but >unfortunately segfaults about once a week here). The thing, what should mostly be fixed sometime is the buildsystem. BTW. does anyone have has debianised the sourcetree? Greetings Jan -- One time, you all will be emulated by linux! ---- Jan- Hendrik Palic Url:"http://www.billgotchy.de"; E-Mail: "palic@billgotchy.de" -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- C++ UL++ P+++ L+++ E W++ N+ o+ K- w--- O- M- V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP++ t--- 5- X+++ R-- tv- b++ DI-- D+++ G+++ e+++ h+ r++ z+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgp2JLeySuOKn.pgp
Description: PGP signature