is there even a chance that anything that us developers come up with here is going to be implemented anyway, or are we all wasting our time discussing something that the people involved are not even willing to discuss. On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 08:12:43PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Nils Lohner wrote: > > Why not? It would make out NM procedures so much easier. We should > > probably do the same thing for any potential developer. > > I am much more in favour of the other two options: > * do the reverse and reject if not approved in a certain timeframe > * change the procedures to force sequential processing to some degree. > We have to take into account that it is not practical to force > complete sequential processing since some applicants will need a > phonecall that can't be made when the DAM has time and other applicants > should not suffer due to that. > > > And self-destruct Debian effectively, giving us all more free time. > > I'm not sure I could handle so much free time :) > > Wichert. > > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ > | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | > | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > -- Jason Thomas Phone: +61 2 6257 7111 System Administrator - UID 0 Fax: +61 2 6257 7311 tSA Consulting Group Pty. Ltd. Mobile: 0418 29 66 81 1 Hall Street Lyneham ACT 2602 http://www.topic.com.au/
Attachment:
pgpX6ZcqQYwBD.pgp
Description: PGP signature