Re: deps on non-free [Bug#106427: printtool: versioned deps for gs]
Colin Walters wrote:
> There is also the related situation of
> declaring a dependency on packages which don't exist in the archive at
> all. For example, a number of Emacs Lisp packages declare Depends:
> emacs20 | emacs21, for example, while emacs21 doesn't exist in the
> archive yet. If policy is going to amended, it would be nice to
> explicitly allow this as well.
Right. That's just forward-thinking!
(can't wait to see that in the archive).
Peter
Reply to: