Re: Unpleasant problem w/ foo-config style scripts (and possible solutions).

To: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, gtk-list@gnome.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gnucash-devel@lists.gnucash.org
Subject: Re: Unpleasant problem w/ foo-config style scripts (and possible solutions).
From: Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>
Date: 23 Jul 2001 14:06:16 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] y5wofqbcyg7.fsf@icon.labs.redhat.com>
In-reply-to: Rob Browning's message of "23 Jul 2001 12:39:15 -0500"
References: <[🔎] 87hew3v930.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org>

Hi,

Solutions 1) and 2) could both be implemented on the pkg-config level,
so once *-config goes away replaced by pkg-config (already done for
GTK 2 and most of the GNOME 2 stuff), it should be relatively simple
to implement either of those.

http://www.freedesktop.org/software/pkgconfig/

Havoc

Reply to:

References:
- Unpleasant problem w/ foo-config style scripts (and possible solutions).
  - From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Smarter handling of generated configuration files
Next by Date: Re: Outdated GNU config (config.{sub,guess}) and autotools-dev
Previous by thread: Unpleasant problem w/ foo-config style scripts (and possible solutions).
Next by thread: Re: Unpleasant problem w/ foo-config style scripts (and possible solutions).
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread