Re: LSB

[Anand Kumria <wildfire@progsoc.uts.edu.au>]

On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 09:56:47PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Chad Miller <cmiller@surfsouth.com> writes:
> 
> > What are we going to do about the LSB, which specifies RPM?  Ignore it?
> 
> Use alien or rpm (alien is best for the system I think)

Or we could just use RPM. 
<URL: http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/x12251.html> 
indicates an LSB compliant RPM may only depend upon the lsb package.

We could have a lsb.deb which setup the required rpm infrastructure and
depended upon other required libraries instead of modifying priorities
of our own libraries too much.[1]

Anand

[1]: Branden perhaps that bug against xlibmesa3 I filed with premature