Re: webmin question
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:37:26PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > > Sure, it does not depend on any other webmin package (why?) but so does
> > > webmin, the non-ssl version, and that one hasn't been moved.
> > webmin has a webmin-grub package that depends: on grub, but is arch: all
> > instead of arch: i386. grub isn't available anywhere but i386.
> That explains why webmin-grub is not in testing. But the webmin package
> webmin_0.86-2_all.deb has the very same dependecies as has
> webmin-ssl_0.86-1_all.deb. They only recommend webmin-core which only
> depends on webmin | webmin-ssl (and other not webmin related stuff of
> course). What I cannot understand is why these two are handled differently.
testing operates on source packages as a whole; if one binary from the source
can't go in because it breaks on an architecture, no binary from the source
will go in.
webmin.deb and webmin-grub.deb are both from webmin.dsc.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Reply to: