Re: What to do with ae...
On 23-Jun-2001 Edward C. Lang wrote:
> At 20010622.20:44:10 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote
>
> > Previously Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > > If there are no objections (or takers) I am ready to drop this package.
> >
> > Objections? I expect celebrations!
>
> I, for one, object. Until emacs is included on the base-floppies, I find ae a
> damn sight easier to use than any other minimalist editor. ae is simple,
> unpretentious, original in that it isn't just a cheap knock off of some other
> lame editor, and quick to type.
>
I hope you are kidding. nano is about a billion times better than ae in all
respects. ae sucked and its only reason for being used is it was 100% neutral
territory -- everyone hated it equally. Plus it was small.
Reply to: