Re: UPSD packages in bad state
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:37:04PM +0200, tillea@rki.de wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
>
> > I worked pretty hard on the README.Debian contained in nut. It has a
> Yes, your README.Debian is really excellent and more complete than
> many other README.Debian in other packages.
>
> > step-by-step set of instructions on how to set up nut. Moreover, all the
> > upstream documentation is provided in nut-doc, so I would suggest
> > installing that. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to try to
> > answer them.
> Nice offer. Currently I have to fight hard against a crashing
> Sun E250 and no time for nut. But I will come back to this topic
> privately.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas, hoping for a unified ups daemon, which nut seems to
> have the power.
>
> PS: Anyway working example configurations for APC Smart UPS with
> 940-0024B cable are welcome.
>
As far as I recall, This number (940-0024B) is mentioned quite frequently
in the NUT mailing lists
(ups@lists.exploits.org and upsdev@lists.exploits.org). Those lists are
archived in lists.exploits.org.
The upstream author is very responsive. Unfortunately he is away till
the end of the week.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
Shaul Karl <shaulka@bezeqint.net>
Hillel used to say: If I am not for myself who will be for me?
Yet, if I am for myself only, what am I? And if not now, when?
(Ethics Of The Fathers 1:14)
Reply to: