On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Shouldn't lg-base get into testing then?
> update_output says:
> lg-base: alpha: lg-all lg-latest-two lg-subscription
> (note that the problem is not in the lg-base package)
> And these three packages depend on lg-issue67. lg-issue67 can't go into
> testing because it's too new:
Yes, of course. Forgot that. Pardon my ignorance ;-)
wouter dot verhelst at advalvas in Belgium
This is Linux world. On a quiet day, you can hear Windows reboot.