On Sun, 17 Jun 2001 email@example.com wrote:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org says about lg-base:
> + lg-base uploaded 15 days ago, out of date by 5 days!
> + valid candidate (will be installed unless it's dependent upon other
> buggy pgks)
> If I check the dependencies, there's only libhtml-parser-perl that's
> buggy. However, my package does not care about versions for
> libhtml-parser-perl, and libhtml-parser-perl, be it a previous version, is
> available in testing.
> Shouldn't lg-base get into testing then?
lg-base: alpha: lg-all lg-latest-two lg-subscription
(note that the problem is not in the lg-base package)
And these three packages depend on lg-issue67. lg-issue67 can't go into
testing because it's too new:
* lg-issue67 3-1 (new) (optional) (low)
+ Maintainer: Wouter Verhelst <firstname.lastname@example.org>
+ only 9/10 days old
+ not considered
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi