Re: Intent to NMU mozilla and ITP mozilla-cvs
If libnspr4 has the same release timing that the rest of mozilla (and here
is perhaps my mistake) I can't understand why split the source and why give
an independant version numbre for it.
On Fri, 08 Jun 2001 06:08:27 Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "kitame" == Takuo KITAME <email@example.com> writes:
> kitame> Hello. I've just done build new mozilla package. It's
> kitame> separated into multi binary package. But still not split
> kitame> libnspr4 from mozilla source. (Is it needed?)
> It would certainly save me from maintaining it seperately. freewrl (a
> package of mine) currently uses a local version of it.
> "If I claimed I was emporer just cause some moistened bint lobbed a
> scimitar at me they'd put me away"
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Software Engineer - email@example.com
Lineo France - Lineo High Availability Group
42-46, rue Médéric - 92110 Clichy - France
phone (33).1.41.40.02.12 - fax (33).1.41.40.02.01