Re: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system
From: Wolfgang Sourdeau <wolfgang@contre.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 20:49:19 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 858zjetka8.wl@debian.home>
Mail-followup-to: stephen@clothcat.demon.co.uk, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 01052510125703.03094@clothcat>
References: <[🔎] 01052510125703.03094@clothcat>

> addendum:
> I am planning to put it in non-us/non-free because of clause 6 of the 
> license folowing some discussion on OPN.

I think that the "Apple License" is not free anyway. Eric Raymond is
pleased to welcome Apple in the Open Source community, but Richard
Stallman is not accepting that license for the Free Software
community.

And btw, if all those companies really wanted to be part of the free
software movement, they would use a license such as the GPL or the X11
license.

Wolfgang

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system
  - From: Stephen Stafford <stephen@clothcat.demon.co.uk>

References:
- ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system
  - From: Stephen Stafford <stephen@clothcat.demon.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: two versions of ncftp required, and with Readline?
Next by Date: Re: AOP: openh323gatekeeper
Previous by thread: Re: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system
Next by thread: Re: ITP: squeak-vm, squeak-image, squeak-sources -- A highly portable Smaltalk system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread