Re: testing inconsistencies
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> I don't know why, but most xemacs21 packages in testing are at
> version 21.4.1-2 except:
>
> xemacs21 21.1.10-4
> xemacs21-support 21.1.10-4
> xemacs21-supportel 21.1.10-4
>
> The first two of these renders it un-installable.
> I thought this wasn't supposed to happen to testing?
It seems to be more strange:
There are different binary versions for e.g. xemacs21 and xemacs21-mule
although they are built from the same source (xemacs21)!
> Peter
cu
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
Reply to: