Re: Automake 2.50 test summary (was: Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Automake 2.50 test summary (was: Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path)
From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>
Date: 26 May 2001 14:02:37 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 8766eowc6a.fsf@falcon.wanadoo.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010526124105.A881@jroger.in-berlin.de>
References: <[🔎] E153Mjo-0003K8-00@pfaffben> <[🔎] 87n180euza.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu> <[🔎] 87lmnkh134.fsf@falcon.wanadoo.fr> <[🔎] 20010526124105.A881@jroger.in-berlin.de>

>>>> "SR" == Sebastian Rittau <srittau@jroger.in-berlin.de> writes:

[...]

SR> Do that. But it's still a bug in your package and until that is fixed,
SR> a bug report is appropriate. You are of course free to add a comment
SR> to the bug report, saying that it is an upstream problem that you
SR> expect to be fixed in one of the next releases.

For the record bug #98784

Christian

Reply to:

References:
- Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path
  - From: pfaffben@msu.edu (Ben Pfaff)
- Automake 2.50 test summary (was: Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path)
  - From: Ben Pfaff <pfaffben@msu.edu>
- Re: Automake 2.50 test summary (was: Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path)
  - From: Christian Marillat <marillat.christian@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: Automake 2.50 test summary (was: Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path)
  - From: Sebastian Rittau <srittau@jroger.in-berlin.de>

Prev by Date: Grouping packages together on-the-fly
Next by Date: Re: Work-needing packages report for May 25, 2001
Previous by thread: Re: Automake 2.50 test summary (was: Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path)
Next by thread: Re: Automake 2.50 test summary (was: Re: Proposed Autoconf 2.50 path)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread