[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: #define NR_TASKS ??

Wichert Akkerman <wichert@valinux.com> writes:

> Previously Viral wrote:
> > For the time being I defined it to be 1024 (hoping thats large and safe) but
> > whats the deal with NR_TASKS in 2.4.4 ? 
> There is no NR_TASKS anymore, programs should just deal with the possibility
> of an unlimited number of processes.

And user-level shouldn't have used it anyway because running a kernel
with a higher NR_TASKS required recompiling top.

Sven Rudolph <sr1@sax.de>		http://www.sax.de/~sr1/

Reply to: