Re: s10sh

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: s10sh
From: Bart Martens <bart.martens@chello.be>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:01:29 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010522110129.B346@bugzone>
Reply-to: bart.martens@advalvas.be
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010522173157.A30897@debian.org>; from bod@debian.org on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:31:57PM +1000
References: <[🔎] 20010522073646.A456@bugzone> <[🔎] 20010522173157.A30897@debian.org>

> >I would like to package s10sh for Debian. If anyone
> >disagrees, please let me know.
> Go read this: http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
> then post an ITP [...]

Thank you for telling me to post an ITP. I followed the outdated
instructions in section 2.1 of the developers reference.
I submitted a bug report to suggest to include your explanation
in the developers reference in 2.1 and 6.1.

Bart Martens

Reply to:

References:
- s10sh
  - From: Bart Martens <bart.martens@chello.be>
- Re: s10sh
  - From: Brendan O'Dea <bod@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: anyone going to USENIX?
Next by Date: Re: Maintaining kernel module packages?
Previous by thread: Re: s10sh
Next by thread: Building on arm.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread