Re: Woody upgrading problems, LILO and debconf
On 20 May 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:
>
>> If it's the same point you and Branden have been trying to hit for the
>> last year, it's bogus, not operative. It's classic _ad hominem_.
>
>No, it's not _ad hominem_.
>
>We want to know who you are. I don't respect people who see the
>inexplicable need to hide, and the more you do so, the more convinced
>I am that you are *ashamed* of your true identity.
Not ashamed, just not willing to reveal it. You may rest assured though
that my real identity is much more boring than my "galt" identity.
>And that's an interesting thing, and it colors everything you say. I
>can think of several possible reasons for your shame, and for each of
>them, it does cast doubt.
Those that need to know, do so. Those that have no need and ask are given
the derision they deserve.
>Thomas
>
--
Galt's sci-fi paradox: Stormtroopers versus Redshirts to the death.
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!
Reply to: