[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: serious bugs/package removal



Michael Meskes <meskes@debian.org> wrote:
>On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 10:32:35AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> If it's not a serious bug, then downgrade it.
>
>Sure that's possible, but does it bring my package back?

Yes. I wouldn't have expected your package to be actively removed from
testing anyway - normally it just blocks new versions of the package
from going in.

>> http://bugs.debian.org has a description of all the severities.
>
>Okay, I checked with the developers reference and found this:
>
>serious 
>     is a severe violation of Debian policy (that is, it violates a "must"
>     or "required" directive), or, in the package maintainer's opinion,
>     makes the package unsuitable for release. 
>
>The bug I got mentions a missing package in the Build-Depends. I have yet to
>check policy to see if this is a "must" or "required" directive, 

Whatever policy says, it's a serious bug due to the problems it causes
for porters; if you declare build dependencies, they must be correct.

-- 
Colin Watson                                     [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: