Re: ash splitting and Herbert Xu (Fw: Bug#97310 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#97310: More package-splitting stupidity))
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:18:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 07:16:49PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > For the amount of thinking that went into those bug reports, I must say
> > > that you deserved it. 96854 is a rehash of an issue that's already before
> > > the TC. You made it out as if you were actually solving an issue (the
> > > common parts kernel-headers). Now either you're just plain stupid or
> > > it's a wind up. With your record, I can't really tell which is the case.
I actually chose to ignore that because it was an insult.
> > So, filing a bug report, with diff, against a package for a serious matter,
> > is immature, while responding with "Piss off." and/or "Go away.", isn't?
> Why don't you read the paragraph at the top and use your brain.
Now it's time for you to straight-out answer a question:
Is responding to a bug report with only either "Piss off." or "Go away.",
Join me on IRC (OpenProjects, DanielS) if you're actually up for serious