Re: ash splitting and Herbert Xu (Fw: Bug#97310 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#97310: More package-splitting stupidity))
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:22:28PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> What a brilliant, endearing, technical response to a serious question.
> Look at the archives for #97310, especially where Aaron points out that the
> bloating to the Packages file actually takes up more room than installing
> ash, as opposed to ash-medium, saves.
Well frankly that's the only response you could possibly get by
repeatedly filing such frivolous bugs against my packages.
For the record, ash-medium was intended to be used on the boot floppies as
they lacked a small shell with history support. This is not appropriate in
the main ash package since this history support is incomplete and also
unnecessary for non-interactive use.
> This is another rude, unsatisfactory response I've had from him in the last
> two weeks - are there any other avenues? How would I go about putting these
> (especially kernel-*) to the Technical Commitee?
Why don't you grow up, and then maybe I'll show you some respect.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: