On 01-05-12 Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 03:46:13AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > exim we should move to postfix, IMHO > > <g> > exim: Installed-Size: 1072 > postfix: Installed-Size: 3223 Hm, better compare the Size-Output from apt-cache show _package_. Since you talk only about disk-space, we maybe should switch back to smail because: Package: smail Size: 506536 Package: exim Size: 746472 Package: postfix Size: 1510828 > > dpkg-ftp obsolete > > rcs few use it > > replace it with cvs Hm, haven't you just be arguing about the Installed-Size of exim vs. postfix to show that exim should be preferred? If yes, then you should argue now also for rcs, because of this: Package: rcs Size: 298102 Package: cvs Size: 937000 Or why do you argue about the disk-space that the mta uses, when you now ignore this aspect and instead prefer switching to a software that is about 3 times bigger? > > vacation why standard? > > fingerd not very secure for baseline > > ftpd not very secure for baseline > > lpr not very secure for baseline, poss use lprng? > > why a print daemon? most user doesn't need such service > if it is necesary, why not use cups as standard? Hm, is cups now configurable without using any web-access? I haven't heared anything that you can configure cups with an editor, which is a advantage of lpr and lprng. > > nfs-kernel-server why standard in god's name? > > rblcheck why standard? > > exim use this? i don't know No, but I think dnsutils depended once on it and dnsutils is standard. Christian -- Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org) 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
Attachment:
pgpdIzb0RwLAt.pgp
Description: PGP signature