Re: Question
While this is useful information, and I don't want to disparage you for
providing it, the fact is that the maintainer is irresponsible for simply
closing this bug report (twice!) without any real explanation. The
"unreproducible" tag exists for a freaking reason...
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:20:34PM -0400, dilinger@mail.kludge-sound.com <dilinger@mail.kludge-sound.com> spake forth:
> ^U works fine for me (updating the screen/terminal as appropriate),
> under gnome-terminal-1.4.0.3-2 and bash-2.05-4. There is probably
> something external that's causing this behavior (or at least causing
> it to appear). Note the following, as well:
>
> [dilinger@wax mp3]$ stty
> speed 38400 baud; line = 0;
> ixany
> -echok
> [dilinger@wax mp3]$
>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 06:56:30PM -0500, Taral wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:36:23PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > > Taral wrote:
> > > >I recently filed a bug which the maintainer insists on closing with
> > > >"Sorry, but this works." It is a real problem on my system, and I
> > > >consider it somewhat irresponsible of the maintainer to continue to
> > > >close the bug. What are the developer guidelines on this, and what can I
> > > >do (besides reopening it) if this problem persists?
> > >
> > > Tell us what the bug is so that we can have a look and see which of
> > > you we agree with. Some other solution might emerge.
> >
> > #97094. He closed it again, even after I posted a patch.
> >
> > --
> > Taral <taral@taral.net>
> > Please use PGP/GPG encryption to send me mail.
> > "Any technology, no matter how primitive, is magic to those who don't
> > understand it." -- Florence Ambrose
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
Mike Markley <mike@markley.org>
GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7 0DC0 EF31 DF83 7313 FE2B 77A8 F36A 3B04 7084
I object to intellect without discipline; I object to power without
constructive purpose.
- Spock, "The Squire of Gothos", stardate 2124.5
Reply to: