[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


>>"Arthur" == Arthur Korn <arthur@korn.ch> writes:

 Arthur> This would make boot-loader dependencies platform independent as
 Arthur> well. Roussell should propose this on debian-policy, to make it
 Arthur> an "official" virutal package. (I don't propse it myself in case
 Arthur> you oppose Russell.)

	The kernel-image packages already have a arch independent
 means of *SUGGESTING* a boot loader package. If this is incorrect for
 some arches, please let me know of what boot loader shall be
 appropriate for the arch, and I shall ripple the changes through.

	How come no one comments about the grub support in the images?

 It is impossible for an optimist to be pleasantly surprised.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: