Re: Bug#96224: libgmp3: Move documentation in the -dev package
On 7 May 2001, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >>>> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <email@example.com> writes:
> SMR> Hi Christian & Dale,
> SMR> If Dale has agreed to do move the docs (either to -dev or to -doc),
> SMR> that seems to me to answer the bug report. I don't understand what
> SMR> question Christian's posting to -devel is supposed to raise.
> Dale said in his conclusion :
> DS> now found in the runtime package makes the most sense. Thus a
> DS> non-development system can still have complete documentation when needed
> DS> without either the runtime or the -dev packages installed. (screw 'em if
> DS> they can't find it ;-)
So, asside from "screw 'em" what's wrong with this statement?
Putting the docs in a separate package means that you can choose to read
the docs without installing either the runtime or the -dev packages. You
are also free to install any combination of the three that suites your
needs. As the runtime and the docs packages are both about the same size,
I saw no reason to bulk up the -dev package with unnecessary cruft.
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "Dwarf's Guide to Debian GNU/Linux" _-_-_-_-_-_-
_- aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769 _-
_- Flexible Software 11000 McCrackin Road _-
_- e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Tallahassee, FL 32308 _-
_-_-_-_-_- Released under the GNU Free Documentation License _-_-_-_-
available at: http://www.polaris.net/~dwarf/