At 02 May 2001 16:10:35 +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Michael Piefel (2001-05-02 15:58:27 +0200) : > > > Am 2.05.01 um 22:46:46 schrieb Tomohiro KUBOTA: > > > Do you think inhibiting all non-ASCII (including ISO-8859-1 > > > aka Latin-1) is too strict? > > > > Oops. That would block my mail because of my signature. I'd say let all > > of Latin-* through, it will just cause a few `?' on the readers side. > > If we start filtering according to charsets (which I'm not really > sure will provide any effectiveness against spam), I will oppose any > scheme that filters out Unicode messages. It's hard enough getting > people to switch to UTF-8, there's no need to provide them with an > excuse to stay with their own charsets. Yes, it is too radical to block anything except US-ASCII. I'd been talking about SPAM in Japanese language only. I only say nealy all of mail which has iso-2022-jp in Content-Type header can judge as SPAM. P.S. Of course we can block these mail by procmail rule if we use Unix system. :-) -- Kenshi Muto kmuto@debian.org
Attachment:
pgppBx2DZubFt.pgp
Description: PGP signature