Re: postgresql and libssl - Bug#95146
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> I have to reiterate a query about what to do with postgresql in view of its
> now being linked with libssl.
>
> Since this question is currently being referred to legal advice, do you
> want me to move postgresql into non-us, which will force any packages
> depending on it into non-us too, or should I leave it alone pending
> resolution of the legal question?
>
> (I do not propose to do anything to remove the ssl code from PostgreSQL.)
>
> --
> Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
> Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
> PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47
> GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
> ========================================
> "And he said to them all, If any man will come after
> me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily,
> and follow me." Luke 9:23
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
When I connect to ftp.kernel.org I see this:
"Due to U.S. Exports Regulations, all cryptographic software on this
site is subject to the following legal notice:
This site includes publicly available encryption source code
which, together with object code resulting from the compiling of
publicly available source code, may be exported from the United
States under License Exception "TSU" pursuant to 15 C.F.R. Section
740.13(e).
This legal notice applies to cryptographic software only. Please see
the Bureau of Export Administration (http://www.bxa.doc.gov/) for more
information about current U.S. regulations."
Does that mean that there is no need for debian non-US anymore?
--
Pedro Larroy Tovar. PiotR | http://omega.resa.es/piotr/
piotr@logiccontrol.es
Reply to: