Re: 2.4.x Kernel, ECN And Problem Websites
Previously Daniel Stone wrote:
> No way should we be pushing ECN to the masses. It should stay in the domain
> of people like DaveM, until routers get fixed.
The same DaveM who said he would enable ECN on vger to force
people who want to subscribe to lkml to fix their equipment?
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |